GRID K120Q vs Radeon HD 6540G2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6540G2 with GRID K120Q, including specs and performance data.

HD 6540G2
2011
1.17
+69.6%

HD 6540G2 outperforms K120Q by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10991222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Power efficiencyno data0.41
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)2 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$125

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480192
Core clock speedno data850 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rateno data13.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data891 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 30−35
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Valorant 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Valorant 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 0.69
Recency 14 June 2011 2 July 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

HD 6540G2 has a 69.6% higher aggregate performance score.

GRID K120Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 6540G2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K120Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6540G2 is a notebook graphics card while GRID K120Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6540G2
Radeon HD 6540G2
NVIDIA GRID K120Q
GRID K120Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6540G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GRID K120Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6540G2 or GRID K120Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.