Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics vs Radeon HD 6530M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1116not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.41no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 5 Arrandale (2010)
GPU code nameCapilanoGMA HD
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 November 2010 (15 years ago)10 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40012
Core clock speed450 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors627 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000no data
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs20no data
L1 Cache40 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6530M 3334
+1021%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics 298

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 November 2010 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 40 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 35 Watt

HD 6530M has an age advantage of 10 months, a 13% more advanced lithography process, and 35% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6530M and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6530M or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.