GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 vs Radeon HD 6530M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1103not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.38no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameCapilanoNV18 C1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 November 2010 (14 years ago)14 December 2003 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400no data
Core clock speed450 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors627 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Wattno data
Texture fill rate9.0001.000
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs204
L1 Cache40 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIAGP 8x
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 November 2010 14 December 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

HD 6530M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6530M and GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6530M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6530M
Radeon HD 6530M
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2
GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6530M or GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.