GMA X4500HD vs Radeon HD 6530M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1084not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.46no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameCapilanoEaglelake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 November 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400no data
Core clock speed450 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors627 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate9.0002.132
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs204

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.0
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 November 2010 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 13 Watt

HD 6530M has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500HD, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6530M and GMA X4500HD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6530M is a notebook graphics card while GMA X4500HD is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6530M
Radeon HD 6530M
Intel GMA X4500HD
GMA X4500HD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 17 votes

Rate GMA X4500HD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6530M or GMA X4500HD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.