Radeon Graphics 448SP vs HD 6520G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1221not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.58no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSumoRenoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 December 2011 (14 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320448
Core clock speed400 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate6.40053.20
Floating-point processing power0.256 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2011 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 448SP has an age advantage of 8 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6520G and Radeon Graphics 448SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6520G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics 448SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Radeon HD 6520G
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 150 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6520G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 94 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6520G or Radeon Graphics 448SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.