Radeon Picasso vs HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1096not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameno dataPicasso
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 February 2012 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480640
Core clock speed400 / 700 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1301 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data52.04
Floating-point processing powerno data1.665 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1800 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm

Picasso has a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics and Radeon Picasso. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Picasso is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6520G HD 7450M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon Picasso on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics or Radeon Picasso, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.