Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 vs Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1089not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameno dataCedar Trail
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 February 2012 (13 years ago)1 November 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4804
Core clock speed400 / 700 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1800 MHzno data
Shared memory++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics 3384
+338300%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 February 2012 1 November 2011
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm

HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics has an age advantage of 3 months.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6520G HD 7450M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 164 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.