Iris Plus Graphics 930 vs Radeon HD 6480G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1263not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.34no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameSumoIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240256
Core clock speed444 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.32816.00
Floating-point processing power0.2131 TFLOPS0.512 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 930 has a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 133% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6480G and Iris Plus Graphics 930. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6480G is a notebook graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics 930 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 158 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6480G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6480G or Iris Plus Graphics 930, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.