A100 SXM4 vs Radeon HD 6480G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1240not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.33no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSumoGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 June 2011 (14 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2406912
Core clock speed444 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate5.328609.1
Floating-point processing power0.2131 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs4160
TMUs12432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2E
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared40 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,555 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 14 May 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 400 Watt

HD 6480G has 1042.9% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6480G and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6480G is a notebook graphics card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6480G
Radeon HD 6480G
NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 143 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6480G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6480G or A100 SXM4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.