Radeon HD 6450 vs GeForce GT 220

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GT 220
2009
1GB GDDR3
0.55
+7.8%

GeForce GT 220 outperforms Radeon HD 6450 by 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11711186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT216Caicos
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date12 October 2009 (14 years ago)7 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 $55
Current price$121 (1.5x MSRP)$166 (3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 220 and HD 6450 have a nearly equal value for money.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48160
CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed625 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors486 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt30 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate9.8405.000
Floating-point performance144 gflops200.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0PCIe 2.0 x8
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length6.6" (16.8 cm)168 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.3 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data8.5-12.8 GB/x (DDR3) or 25.6-28.8 GB/s (GDDR5)

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADVIHDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Multi monitor support+no data
Eyefinityno data1
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data4
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
DisplayPort supportno data+
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIF + HDAno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data-
CrossFireno data1
Endurono data-
HD3Dno data-
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
ZeroCoreno data-

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)DirectX® 11
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.14.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/Ano data
Mantleno data-
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 220 0.55
+7.8%
HD 6450 0.51

GeForce GT 220 outperforms Radeon HD 6450 by 8% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 220 214
+8.1%
HD 6450 198

GeForce GT 220 outperforms Radeon HD 6450 by 8% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hitman 3 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how GT 220 and HD 6450 compete in popular games:

  • GT 220 is 16.7% faster than HD 6450 in 1080p

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.55 0.51
Recency 12 October 2009 7 April 2011
Cost $79.99 $55
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 30 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GT 220 and Radeon HD 6450.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Radeon HD 6450

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 659 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 463 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.