ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs HD 6450 GDDR5

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11301540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.44no data
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameCaicosRV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 April 2011 (13 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speed750 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX118.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p7no data
Full HD15no data
1200p5no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Fortnite 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 29 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Fortnite 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 5−6 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2011 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 28 Watt

HD 6450 GDDR5 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 3.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 69 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.