H3C XG310 vs Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1184not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.54no data
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameCaicosDG1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2011 (14 years ago)11 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160768 ×4
Core clock speed750 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data52.80 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPsno data24 ×4
TMUsno data48 ×4
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed900 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.26 GB/s ×4
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2011 11 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 300 Watt

HD 6450 GDDR5 has 1011.1% lower power consumption.

H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 is a desktop graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Intel H3C XG310
H3C XG310

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 27 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.