Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1118not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.44no data
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameCaicosMontevina
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 April 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16010
Core clock speed750 MHz533 MHz
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1110

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 6450 GDDR5 4257
+2836%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD 145

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2011 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm

HD 6450 GDDR5 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 is a desktop card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 24 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 229 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.