FirePro A320 vs Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1191not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.54no data
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameCaicosTrinity GL
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2011 (14 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160384
Core clock speed750 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data955 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data22.92
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7334 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2011 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 100 Watt

HD 6450 GDDR5 has 270% lower power consumption.

FirePro A320, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 and FirePro A320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro A320 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 27 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate FirePro A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 or FirePro A320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.