ATI Radeon 9100 vs HD 6350A

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.02
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameCedarR200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 April 2011 (13 years ago)1 April 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed650 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors292 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate5.2002.000
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 April 2011 1 April 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 28 Watt

HD 6350A has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 12% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6350A and Radeon 9100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6350A is a notebook card while Radeon 9100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6350A
Radeon HD 6350A
ATI Radeon 9100
Radeon 9100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6350A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate Radeon 9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.