Radeon RX 470D vs HD 6310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1387not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.24no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameLovelandEllesmere
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 November 2010 (15 years ago)21 October 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801792
Core clock speed276 MHz926 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1206 MHz
Number of transistors450 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate2.208135.1
Floating-point processing power0.04416 TFLOPS4.322 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1650 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data211.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 November 2010 21 October 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 120 Watt

HD 6310 has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RX 470D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6310 and Radeon RX 470D. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6310 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 470D is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6310
Radeon HD 6310
AMD Radeon RX 470D
Radeon RX 470D

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 276 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 148 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6310 or Radeon RX 470D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.