ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs HD 6310
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1387 | 1594 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.24 | no data |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Rage 7 (2001−2006) |
| GPU code name | Loveland | RV280 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 November 2010 (15 years ago) | 1 May 2003 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 80 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 276 MHz | 239 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | 36 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.208 | 0.96 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.04416 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | AGP 8x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 164 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 5.248 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 8.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | no data |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4 | no data |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | no data |
| Valorant | 24−27 | no data |
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14 | no data |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | no data |
| Dota 2 | 9−10 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4 | no data |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | no data |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 | no data |
| Valorant | 24−27 | no data |
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | no data |
| Dota 2 | 9−10 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4 | no data |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | no data |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 | no data |
| Valorant | 24−27 | no data |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | no data |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 0−1 | no data |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4 | no data |
1440p
Ultra
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | no data |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | no data |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | no data |
| Valorant | 2−3 | no data |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2 | no data |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 November 2010 | 1 May 2003 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 28 Watt |
HD 6310 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 55.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6310 and Radeon 9200 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 6310 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 PRO is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
