GeForce G103M vs Radeon HD 6310

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1313not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.22no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameLovelandG98
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 November 2010 (14 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores808
Core clock speed276 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors450 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate2.2085.120
Floating-point processing power0.04416 TFLOPS0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 November 2010 1 September 2009
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 14 Watt

HD 6310 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G103M, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6310 and GeForce G103M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6310
Radeon HD 6310
NVIDIA GeForce G103M
GeForce G103M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 260 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 33 votes

Rate GeForce G103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.