GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample vs Radeon HD 6310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1398not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.24no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameLovelandNV36S
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 November 2010 (15 years ago)18 August 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed276 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors450 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate2.2081.700
Floating-point processing power0.04416 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.5 (full) 2.0 (partial)
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 November 2010 18 August 2003
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 25 Watt

HD 6310 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 39% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6310 and GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6310 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 285 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6310 or GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.