GeForce 9100M G mGPU vs Radeon HD 6310

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1310not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.24no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameLovelandC79
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 November 2010 (14 years ago)29 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores808
Core clock speed276 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors450 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate2.2083.600
Floating-point processing power0.04416 TFLOPS0.0176 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 November 2010 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 12 Watt

HD 6310 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

9100M G mGPU, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6310 and GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6310
Radeon HD 6310
NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 256 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.