Tesla T10 24 GB vs Radeon HD 6290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1417not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.01no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCedarTU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 December 2011 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores804608
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Boost clock speed400 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors292 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate5.200449.3
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPSno data
ROPs496
TMUs8288
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz13 GB/s
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s624.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 260 Watt

HD 6290 has 1268.4% lower power consumption.

Tesla T10 24 GB, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6290 and Tesla T10 24 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6290 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla T10 24 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6290
Radeon HD 6290
NVIDIA Tesla T10 24 GB
Tesla T10 24 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 47 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Tesla T10 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6290 or Tesla T10 24 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.