Radeon E9390 PCIe vs HD 6250 IGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameLovelandEllesmere
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 November 2010 (15 years ago)15 October 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801792
Core clock speed400 MHz713 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1089 MHz
Number of transistors450 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200122.0
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPS3.903 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 November 2010 15 October 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 75 Watt

HD 6250 IGP has 733% lower power consumption.

E9390 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6250 IGP and Radeon E9390 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6250 IGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon E9390 PCIe is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6250 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon E9390 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6250 IGP or Radeon E9390 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.