Tesla S2050 vs Radeon HD 6230

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1308not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.74no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameParkGF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 July 2011 (14 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80448 ×4
Core clock speed650 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors292 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt900 Watt
Texture fill rate5.20032.14 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs448 ×4
TMUs856 ×4
L1 Cache16 KB896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed667 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s148.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 900 Watt

HD 6230 has 4636.8% lower power consumption.

Tesla S2050, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6230 and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6230 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla S2050 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6230
Radeon HD 6230
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6230 or Tesla S2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.