GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a vs ATI Radeon HD 5870

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking663not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.51no data
Power efficiency2.13no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameCypressC78
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 September 2009 (16 years ago)6 May 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160016
Core clock speed850 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)188 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate68.004.000
Floating-point processing power2.72 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs808
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a, 1x DisplayPort 1.11x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 September 2009 6 May 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 188 Watt 40 Watt

ATI HD 5870 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

8100 + nForce 720a, on the other hand, has 370% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5870 and GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5870
Radeon HD 5870
NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 242 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5870 or GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.