FirePro W4150M vs ATI Radeon HD 5830

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking733not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.81no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameCypressMars
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 February 2010 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1120384
Core clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data850 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Wattno data
Texture fill rate44.8020.40
Floating-point processing power1.792 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs5624
L1 Cache112 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length282 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

W4150M has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5830 and FirePro W4150M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5830 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro W4150M is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 79 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5830 or FirePro W4150M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.