ATI FirePro V3800 vs ATI Radeon HD 5830

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking723not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.81no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameCypressRedwood
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 February 2010 (15 years ago)26 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$129

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1120400
Core clock speed800 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate44.8013.00
Floating-point processing power1.792 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs5620
L1 Cache112 KB40 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length282 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 February 2010 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 43 Watt

ATI HD 5830 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI V3800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 307% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5830 and FirePro V3800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5830 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V3800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5830
Radeon HD 5830
ATI FirePro V3800
FirePro V3800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 79 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 51 votes

Rate FirePro V3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5830 or FirePro V3800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.