ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 vs ATI Radeon HD 5830

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking706not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.80no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameCypressRV620
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 February 2010 (15 years ago)2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112040
Core clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate44.801.600
Floating-point processing power1.792 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs564

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x1
Length282 mm170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x VHDCI
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 32 Watt

ATI HD 5830 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1, on the other hand, has 446.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5830 and FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5830 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5830
Radeon HD 5830
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1
FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 77 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5830 or FirePro 2450 Multi-View PCIe x1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.