Quadro 4100 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking774not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.44no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameJuniperGK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 October 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7201344
Core clock speed700 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate25.2089.26
Floating-point processing power1.008 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1632
TMUs36112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length178 mm160 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1782 MBps
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s57.02 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro 4100 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 145.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5750 and Quadro 4100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5750 is a desktop card while Quadro 4100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750
NVIDIA Quadro 4100
Quadro 4100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 298 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.