Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking774not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.41no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameJuniperGF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 October 2009 (15 years ago)12 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores720256
Core clock speed700 MHz475 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt142 Watt
Texture fill rate25.2015.20
Floating-point processing power1.008 TFLOPS0.4864 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length178 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1792 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz702 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s89.86 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 October 2009 12 June 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1792 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 142 Watt

ATI HD 5750 has 65.1% lower power consumption.

4000 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5750 and Quadro 4000 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5750 is a desktop card while Quadro 4000 Mac Edition is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 298 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 15 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.