GeForce2 MX vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8411600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.51no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameJuniperNV11 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 October 2009 (16 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores720no data
Core clock speed700 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Wattno data
Texture fill rate25.200.7
Floating-point processing power1.008 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs364
L1 Cache72 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length178 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x VGA
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 5750 1173
+58550%
Samples: 2483
GeForce2 MX 2
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 October 2009 28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

ATI HD 5750 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5750 and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 316 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 28 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5750 or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.