GMA 3650 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking834not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.50no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameJuniperCedarview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 October 2009 (16 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72032
Core clock speed700 MHz640 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate25.202.560
Floating-point processing power1.008 TFLOPS0.04096 TFLOPS
ROPs161
TMUs364
L1 Cache72 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length178 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1150 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth73.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.4ES 2.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 October 2009 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 13 Watt

ATI HD 5750 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3650, on the other hand, has 561.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5750 and GMA 3650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5750 is a desktop graphics card while GMA 3650 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750
Intel GMA 3650
GMA 3650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 308 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate GMA 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5750 or GMA 3650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.