FireStream 9350 vs ATI Radeon HD 5570

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1043not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.20no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRedwoodCypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date9 February 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4001440
Core clock speed650 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors627 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)39 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate13.0050.40
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPS2.016 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2072

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length165 mm241 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s128.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 February 2010 1 June 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 39 Watt 150 Watt

ATI HD 5570 has 284.6% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5570 and FireStream 9350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5570 is a desktop card while FireStream 9350 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5570
Radeon HD 5570
AMD FireStream 9350
FireStream 9350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 267 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.