GeForce 9200M vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1346
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.20
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV770C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 January 2009 (16 years ago)15 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80016
Core clock speed750 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors956 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate30.003.600
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs408
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length250 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed850 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2009 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 12 Watt

ATI HD 4870 Mac Edition has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200M, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition and GeForce 9200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9200M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.