GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs ATI Radeon HD 4860

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated988
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Power efficiencyno data0.75
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV790G92
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date9 September 2009 (15 years ago)11 December 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640128
Core clock speed700 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors959 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt135 Watt
Texture fill rate22.4041.60
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS0.416 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz820 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s52.48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 September 2009 11 December 2007
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 135 Watt

ATI HD 4860 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 18.2% more advanced lithography process, and 3.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4860 and GeForce 8800 GTS 512. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4860
Radeon HD 4860
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 124 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.