GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a vs ATI Radeon HD 4810

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking950not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.49no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV770C78
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 May 2009 (16 years ago)6 May 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016
Core clock speed625 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors956 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate20.004.000
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length246 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2009 6 May 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 40 Watt

ATI HD 4810 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

8100 + nForce 720a, on the other hand, has 137.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4810 and GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4810
Radeon HD 4810
NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 26 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 18 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4810 or GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.