Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)no data
GPU code nameRV740no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 September 2009 (16 years ago)31 October 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64040
Core clock speed730 MHzno data
Number of transistors826 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate23.36no data
Floating-point processing power0.9344 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)no data
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 September 2009 31 October 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 53 Watt

Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 88.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4750 and M3 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4750 is a desktop graphics card while Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4750
Radeon HD 4750
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
M3 Max 40-Core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 57 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 274 votes

Rate M3 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4750 or M3 Max 40-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.