RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded vs ATI Radeon HD 4700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV730AD103
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 February 2010 (14 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3209728
Core clock speed600 MHz1425 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2115 MHz
Number of transistors514 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20643.0
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS41.15 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs32304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 February 2010 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 120 Watt

ATI HD 4700 has 140% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4700 and RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4700 is a desktop card while RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4700
Radeon HD 4700
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded
RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 20 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.