GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i vs ATI Radeon HD 4670

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1174not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.19no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV730C79
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 September 2008 (17 years ago)18 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$67 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016
Core clock speed750 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors514 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate24.003.600
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.14.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2008 18 June 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 40 Watt

ATI HD 4670 has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

9300 + nForce 730i, on the other hand, has 47.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4670 and GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4670
Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 167 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 nForce 730i on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4670 or GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.