Radeon R5 230 vs ATI HD 4670 AGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.09
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV730Caicos
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date17 July 2007 (17 years ago)3 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320160
Core clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistors514 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate24.005.000
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS0.2 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 1.0 x4
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Length193 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataN/A

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s10.67 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Eyefinity-+
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
​PowerPlayno data+
DDMA audiono data-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)DirectX® 11
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2007 3 April 2014
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 19 Watt

R5 230 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 210.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4670 AGP and Radeon R5 230. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP
Radeon HD 4670 AGP
AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 238 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.