ATI Radeon 9800 PRO vs ATI HD 4670 AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1415
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameRV730R350
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 July 2007 (17 years ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed750 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors514 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate24.003.040
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 8x
Length193 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2007 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 47 Watt

ATI HD 4670 AGP has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO, on the other hand, has 25.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4670 AGP and Radeon 9800 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4670 AGP
Radeon HD 4670 AGP
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Radeon 9800 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4670 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 58 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.