ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI vs ATI HD 4650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1258not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameRV730RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 September 2008 (17 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed600 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors514 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate19.200.8
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs324
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)8.1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2008 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 28 Watt

ATI HD 4650 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE PCI, on the other hand, has 71.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4650 and Radeon 9200 SE PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4650
Radeon HD 4650
ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI
Radeon 9200 SE PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 261 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 9200 SE PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4650 or Radeon 9200 SE PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.