A100 SXM4 80 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 4650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1258not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.95no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV730GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 September 2008 (17 years ago)16 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3206912
Core clock speed600 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors514 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20609.1
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs8160
TMUs32432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache64 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB80 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s2,039 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)N/A
Shader Model4.1N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2008 16 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 400 Watt

ATI HD 4650 has 733.3% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 31900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4650 and A100 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4650 is a desktop graphics card while A100 SXM4 80 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4650
Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 260 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 81 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4650 or A100 SXM4 80 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.