Arctic Sound 2T vs ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1293not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.79no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRV730Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 September 2008 (17 years ago)2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3207680 ×2
Core clock speed600 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors514 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20216.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS13.82 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs8120 ×2
TMUs32240 ×2
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed400 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s1.23 TB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 500 Watt

ATI HD 4650 AGP has 941.7% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 2T, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4650 AGP and Arctic Sound 2T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4650 AGP is a desktop graphics card while Arctic Sound 2T is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
Arctic Sound 2T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 2T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4650 AGP or Arctic Sound 2T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.