Radeon Pro V520 vs ATI HD 4580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated220
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.01
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRV635Navi 12
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 November 2011 (14 years ago)1 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1202304
Core clock speed796 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors378 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate6.368230.4
Floating-point processing power0.191 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8144
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length190 mm267 mm
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed693 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.18 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 November 2011 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

ATI HD 4580 has 246.2% lower power consumption.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4580 and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4580 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4580
Radeon HD 4580
AMD Radeon Pro V520
Radeon Pro V520

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4580 or Radeon Pro V520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.