Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile vs ATI HD 4570 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV635Fenghuang
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 November 2009 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120no data
Core clock speed796 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors378 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate6.368no data
Floating-point processing power0.191 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length190 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed396 MHz2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.67 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

ATI HD 4570 Rebrand has 54% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 24 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand and Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand or Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.