Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs ATI HD 4570 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV635Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 November 2009 (16 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1203584 ×2
Core clock speed796 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors378 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate6.368224.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.191 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs464 ×2
TMUs8224 ×2
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length190 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed396 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.67 GB/s483.8 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2009 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 230 Watt

ATI HD 4570 Rebrand has 253.8% lower power consumption.

Pro V320 MxGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand or Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.