RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated48
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.93
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV635AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 November 2009 (15 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1206144
Core clock speed796 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors378 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate6.368417.6
Floating-point processing power0.191 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cache128 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length190 mm245 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed396 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.67 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2009 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

ATI HD 4570 Rebrand has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand and RTX 4000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 65 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4570 Rebrand or RTX 4000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.