Riva TNT2 Ultra vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1274not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.27no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameRV710NV5 B5
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 September 2008 (16 years ago)15 March 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed600 MHz150 MHz
Number of transistors242 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.8000.3
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s2.928 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)6.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 2008 15 March 1999
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 250 nm

ATI HD 4350 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 354.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4350 and Riva TNT2 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4350
Radeon HD 4350
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 Ultra
Riva TNT2 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 220 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 29 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.