HD Graphics 16EU Mobile vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1269not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.29no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameRV710Ironlake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 2008 (16 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8096
Core clock speed600 MHz133 MHz
Boost clock speedno data500 MHz
Number of transistors242 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8008.000
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16QPI
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)10.1
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 2008 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 55 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 35 Watt

ATI HD 4350 has 75% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics 16EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 22.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4350 and HD Graphics 16EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4350 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 16EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4350
Radeon HD 4350
Intel HD Graphics 16EU Mobile
HD Graphics 16EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 220 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate HD Graphics 16EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.