ATI Radeon 7200 vs ATI HD 4250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13961602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.89no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameRV620R100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 February 2009 (16 years ago)1 April 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed594 MHz166 MHz
Number of transistors181 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate2.3761
Floating-point processing power0.04752 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs46
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed396 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.336 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)7.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI HD 4250 122
+6000%
Samples: 880
ATI 7200 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 2−3 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 February 2009 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 23 Watt

ATI HD 4250 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 8.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4250 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 4250
Radeon HD 4250
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 86 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4250 or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.